BACORE / SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION 01 / 04

Workflow Review Hub

Turn documents into decisions your team can review.

Workflow Review Hub connects document intake, AI extraction, source evidence, human approval and integration with business systems.

Document intake • AI extraction • Human review • System integration

REVIEW EXAMPLE • DOCUMENT 024

Keep the source in sight.

EXTRACTED FIELD

Service start: 14 October

Source: page 2, service schedule

REVIEW REQUIRED

Two dates found

Confirm the correct date before approval.

Document → Extracted fields → Reviewer → Business system

Sample review record: resolve the ambiguous date before sending the approved data to the business system.

APPLIED AI / WORKFLOW ENGINEERING

01 / INTAKE

Documents & metadata

02 / EXTRACT

Fields with evidence

03 / REVIEW

Human approval

04 / INTEGRATE

Traceable delivery

THE PROBLEM

Extraction is only the beginning.

Documents arrive in different formats, contain conflicting details and often trigger work in another system. A useful application must make uncertainty visible, give reviewers enough context to decide and keep approved data consistent with downstream records.

EXAMPLE SCENARIO

An operations team receives a service agreement. AI proposes the relevant fields and their source passages. A reviewer resolves an ambiguous date, approves the record and hands it to the existing operations system through an API.

SYSTEM WORKFLOW

How the system works.

01

Capture the original

Store the document, its origin and a version identifier. File validation and access rules sit at the intake boundary.

02

Extract against a schema

Ask the model for specific fields and source references. Validate the structure, required values and business rules before it reaches the review queue.

03

Make review explicit

Present the source beside the extracted fields. Record corrections, reviewer identity and the approved version; unresolved fields remain visible.

04

Deliver and reconcile

Send approved records through a connector. Track acknowledgements and reconcile retries so repeated delivery does not create duplicate business actions.

ENGINEERING DECISIONS

Key technical decisions.

Recoverable background jobs

Explicit states and background jobs separate upload, extraction, review and delivery. Each job persists its progress so processing can resume after an interruption.

Controlled AI output

A model adapter, schema validation and retained source references keep model output separate from approved business data. Reviewers control which values become part of the approved record.

Integrations that recover

An outbox stores records waiting for delivery. A unique key prevents retries from creating duplicate actions. Failed deliveries stay visible and can be retried.

Technology: C# / .NET · PostgreSQL · RabbitMQ · Object storage · REST APIs · Model adapters

VERIFICATION

How to verify it.

Use these checks to verify normal operation, failure handling and recovery.

Conflicting or missing data

Submit a document with conflicting or missing fields. Verify that it remains in review and that the reviewer can open the original source.

Duplicate requests or delivery retries

Replay the same delivery request. Verify that one approved version produces one downstream business action.

Worker interruption

Interrupt a worker during processing. Verify that the job resumes from persisted state and preserves its history.

SYSTEM SCOPE

What is included.

The system includes a document intake API, extraction workers, a review screen and a connector to the target system. Schemas define the fields to extract. Review rules define who approves them. Deployment settings and recovery checks complete the workflow.

For an existing example of API integration and orchestration, explore our AI Video Orchestration Platform. →

ARCHITECTURE + HANDS-ON IMPLEMENTATION

Bring your document workflow.

Share an example input, the decisions your team makes and the system that needs the result. BACore can scope the architecture and implement the workflow.

Scroll to Top